Cartier's Tank Cintrée Turns 100 In Understated Style
As far as horological hallmarks go, Cartier's Tank is a name that remains iconic. Brought to life in 1916 by French jeweller Louis-François Cartier, its elegant rectangular make takes cues from the delineation of combat vehicles – a fitting choice given its unwavering popularity over the last century. The storied wristwatch has seen many iterations under the helm of its founder. The initial Tank Normale was succeeded by the Basculente, Allongée and other introductions. Fast forward to present day, the Maison quietly introduces a new limited edition variation for a momentous occasion.
Celebrating 100 years, Cartier released the most recent Tank Cintrée – directly translated to mean "curved" – late last year. And though the exclusive selection of 150 pieces has since sold out in true blink-and-you-miss-it fashion, the wristwatch is a testament to the Maison's timelessness. The centennial edition of the timepiece retains familiarity with signature elements such as its Roman numerals, sapphire cabochon winding crown and ardillon buckle bracelet.
Conceptualised by a jeweller, the Tank Cintrée not only revolutionised the use of pocket watches – encouraging men to wear time on their wrists – it also approached the world of watchmaking with an unapologetic 1920's Art Deco flair, harking back to the era in which it was first introduced to the world. This time of excess, glamour and opulence heavily marked the piece's construction and design – including but not limited to: its dynamic curved make, its notable and elegant 46mm length as well as its instantly recognisable breguet hands.
As for today? The watch boasts a case measuring in at a 6.40mm thickness – with an accompanying length and width of 46.30mm x 23mm – as well as a mechanical movement with manual winding, 9780 MC. Other features to note include: a bracelet in brown calfskin, a beige dial as well as a luxurious 18K yellow gold casing.
Does it sound like the makings of a timepiece set to last another 100 years? We think so.
